Home Page
Director's Forum: David Kappos' USPTO Public Blog
Comments:
Unless these comments were incorrectly rejected, there is an attempt to repress the other side of the story with regards to incorrect inventorship determination frequency and this may constitute and illegal censorship of a public forum. Obviously we don’t want a Chinese style government here in America.
Director's Forum: David Kappos' Public Blog
Tuesday Nov 10, 2009
Putting the USPTO to Work for Independent Inventors
Attempted to Post Unsuccessfully "Censored!":
Posting Attempt Rejection on Public Blog - Alleged Spam “Excess of 1000 Characters”
Regarding director Kappos’ references to the reform bills minimal changes to the process for inventorship determination that we now use, the reality is that the system is in a state of awarding patents into the incorrect name 100% of the time or nearly 100% of the time in instances where valuable patents are at issue. These patents of course are the only ones that are worth filing and the only ones that will result in new products coming onto the market. The fairly tale of simultaneous non-collaborative invention needs to be realized and be the subject of necessary legislation changes in addition to the 30 or 40 other methods that inventors are cheated out of their inventions and that are not dealt with in the present legislation. See our website to see all of the needed changes and why the present proposals are absolutely despicable. The fear of losing an invention to the deficiencies of the present and proposed system of inventorship determination represent an extreme detriment to human advancement through innovation and needs to be corrected immediately. Also civil rights violations of inventors must be corrected so they can breathe free as our other citizens do.
http://inventingconsultantcreator.net/MRTPatentLegislationChanges.htm
Attempted Post by: Michael R. Thomas | Nov 17, 2009 at 10:00 AM